There are some identifiable sources of carbon-free energy creation, including wind, nuclear, hydropower, as well as “carbon neutral” sources of energy which include biomass and bio-fuels. All of these sources are considered renewable energy (the exception being nuclear) since they are all constantly being replenished. Their positive impact is that they lower greenhouse gas emissions, but despite this advantage they each, nevertheless, have negative impacts on the environment in other ways.
Statistically these sources of energy only provide approximately 14% of the energy needs used across the globe. They break out as follows: nuclear power provides the world with 6.2% of the world’s energy needs; hydroelectric power 2.2%; wind power is just over 1%. Bio-fuels and biomass make up another 4% of the world’s energy needs.
The environmental drawbacks of these resources vary. Hydroelectric power is a clean source for energy particularly where carbon emissions are concerned; however, regarding fish it has been a great environmental hazard. Those who depend on fishing as an occupation have been negatively impacted by the production of this “clean energy.”
Nuclear power results in essentially no greenhouse emissions, but there are other environmental consequences. There are risks and environmental damage from uranium mining and processing. The nuclear waste itself is extremely hazardous and accidents that occur in any aspect of nuclear processing and disposal can result in very serious consequences to both people and the environment.
Where wind power is concerned there are negative consequences that affect wild life habitats and that also negatively affect specific species.
As for bio-fuels they adversely affects crop production. To meet our goals for gasoline, 80% of the country’s cropland would have to be converted over for energy production. As cropland sizes increase to accommodate both human consumption and energy creation there will be a push to increase the exploitation of forest land and other soil resources.




